Legal Opinion

In re Howard

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 2005No. 04-BG-430Published

1Per curiam

On August 21, 2003, the Supreme Court of Florida publicly reprimanded respondent Phillip T. Howard as discipline for “conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation” in violation of Florida Ethical Rule 4-8.4(c).”1 Bar *682Counsel notified us of this action and on May 18, 2004, pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(d), we referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) for a determination of whether identical, greater or lesser discipline should be imposed as reciprocal discipline, or whether the Board would proceed de novo. The Board now recommends that we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In Re UchenduDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. In Re MacCiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API