Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Consolidated Tank Line Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1892No. 301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNew, J.

The appellee brought this action to recover the value of a horse, which, it is alleged, went upon the appellant’s railway where it was not fenced, and was killed by one of the appellant’s trains.

The complaint, omitting the caption and formal conclusion, is as follows:

“ The Consolidated Tank Line Company, plaintiff, complains of the Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway Company, defendant, and says that the defendant is, and for more than five years last past has been, a rail*41way corporation operating a line of railway from New Albany, in the State of Indiana, to the city of Chicago, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HughesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. MosierIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Indiana Central Railway Co. v. LeamonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Wabash Railroad v. WilliamsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. BurganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. ZumbaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API