Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Chevrefils
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 12, 1988No. 87-265PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
State officials and employees from whom the plaintiff seeks damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 appeal the denial by the Superior Court (DiClerico, J.; Mayland H. Morse, Jr., Esq., Master) of their motion for summary judgment based on the defense of qualified immunity. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
From an agreed statement of facts, undisputed allegations, and the master’s report, it appears that the plaintiff, Mark Richardson, was employed by the State Division of Welfare from 1977 through October 1983. He was then discharged for what the director of the division termed…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Johnson v. FankellSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Reid v. New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Carrillo v. RostroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Arneson v. JezwinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Hughes v. New Hampshire Division of AeronauticsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.