Legal Opinion
Kirkland v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 3, 1977No. 3996-1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.
This case involves a dispute between two insurance companies as to whether liability for a fire loss should be paid entirely by the joint plaintiff, Reliance Insurance Company, as sole insurer of Conduff, the purchaser in possession who had the legal burden of loss, or whether it should be apportioned between Reliance and the defendant, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, because the policy of each company insured the interest of the seller to Conduff.
On July 1, 1971, Eleanor V. Kirkland and her now deceased husband sold the property which is the subject of this action to David A. Schwab under a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. WilbornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Lawrence B. And Harriet F. Vogel v. Northern Assurance Company, Limited, and Mount Joy Mutual Insurance Company (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Newark Fire Ins. Co. v. TurkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- Burns v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Walter B. Hannah, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crown Center Redevelopment Corp. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Indiana Insurance Companies v. Granite State InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1988
- Western Agricultural Insurance v. Industrial Indemnity InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Western Agr. Ins. v. Indus. Indem. Ins.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Compass Insurance Co. v. Cravens, Dargan & Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.