Legal Opinion

Berenson v. Monadnock Associates, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided April 10, 2006No. 045503EPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MacDonald, D. Lloyd, J.

Before the Court is the Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and the Defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment as to all counts of the complaint. The Plaintiffs motion is DENIED, and the Defendants’ cross motion is ALLOWED as to Count I of the complaint resting on the Wage Act, G.L.c. 149, §§148 and 160. The cross motion is DENIED as to the remaining counts. The Court’s reasoning is as follows.

1. The Plaintiff, a Harvard Law School and Harvard Business School graduate with an entrepreneurial career in a succession of start up companies, became employed at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Wiedmann v. Bradford Group, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Beaule v. M.S. Inserts & Fasteners Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2004
  4. Richards v. Datatec Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API