Security Trust Co. v. Taylor

DIFFENDAFFER, C.

The first question raised by this appeal presents the identical question covered by the first paragraph of the syllabus in Lashley v. Dexter, 133 Okla. 297, 272 Pac. 427.

Plaintiff in error admits in its brief that the question of law involved herein was settled by this court in Lashley v. Dexter, supra. It will, therefore, be unnecessary to discuss the question of law involved.

It is contended that all the testimony clearly shows:

“That the American Investment Company paid off the coupons, and the holder of mortgage, the Security Trust Company, did not surrender the coupons…