Legal Opinion
Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Archer
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 19, 1981No. 79-4231PublishedCited by 135 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
This case involves a routine dispute over whether a summary judgment was correct, but it also requires us to discuss the requirements that must be observed by a district court before it orders the entry of a separate judgment under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We recite only the bare outline of a controversy which involves other events and technical details that are unnecessary for the purposes of this opinion. Morrison-Knudsen Co. (M-K) formerly owned rights to mine coal from an area known as the Elk River Project in British Columbia. By a letter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Brunswick Corporation and Sherwood Medical Industries, Inc. v. David S. Sheridan and National Catheter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
3Cited by135 opinions
- Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Eric Noel v. Brian C. Hall Sandra A. Hall, Fka Sandra Johnson, and Gabrielle S. Lennartz Herb Weisser Michelle A. MerchantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Edwards v. Prime, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.