Henry v. Carpenter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
The action was tried to a jury and a verdict and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff. It is from said judgment that defendants have perfected this appeal.
The defendants will be referred to as Henry, and National, respectively for the purpose of brevity.
One of the contentions by the defendants is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and judgment as against the defendant National.
The evidence reveals that defendant Henry, Norman Speir, another employee of National, and O. L. Thee, a member of the Board of Directors and Vice-President for National, departed from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fairmont Creamery Co. v. CarstenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Hill v. McQueenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Tulsa General Drivers, Warehousemen, & Helpers Union v. ConleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Kastrup v. Yellow Cab & Baggage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Mason v. NibelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williamson v. Fowler Toyota, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Dill v. RaderCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Urabazo v. Humpty Dumpty SupermarketsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Williamson v. Fowler Toyota, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998