Legal Opinion
Mason v. Nibel
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 10, 1928No. 17437PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, C.
The plaintiff, A. H. Nibel, alleged that he was the owner and in possession of about 3,000 barrels of crude oil, which was on the land of one Wilson, and was making preparation to place said oil in tanks and dispose of the same on a ready market at the sum of 90 cents per barrel, and that Dale Mooney, a defendant, acting for himself and D. B. Mason, another defendant, converted said oil to the use of himself and Mason; that said oil was taken and converted by said defendants without the consent of plaintiff, and after said plaintiff had notified defendants not to take the oil. He…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aylesbury Mercantile Co. v. FitchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Thorp Oil & Specialty Co. v. Home Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Oklahoma Automobile Co. v. BennerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Bale v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Dodd-Lear Hardwood Lumber Co. v. GyrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aquamsi Land Co. v. City of Cape GirardeauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Rosser v. Standard Milling CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Dobbins v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Federal National Bank v. LindseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Clark v. BrienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.