Legal Opinion
Hill v. McQueen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 27, 1951No. 33912PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This action was brought by defendant in error, McQueen, against plaintiffs in error, L. C. Hill and Johnston Seed Company, a partnership, and the members thereof, to recover damages for personal injuries received in an assault and battery committed upon McQueen’s person by Hill. Johnston Seed Company was engaged in the business of selling farm and garden seeds with its principal place of business at Enid, Oklahoma. Hill was its general manager and as such was authorized to make collections of indebtedness to the company. During 1944 and part of 1945 McQueen occupied a contractual relation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ada-Konawa Bridge Co. v. CargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Pure Oil Co. v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. RadfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Fairmont Creamery Co. v. CarstenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Matsuda v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Rodebush Ex Rel. Rodebush v. Oklahoma Nursing Homes, Ltd.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Bosh v. Cherokee County Building AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Mistletoe Express Service, Inc. v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Clemmons v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.