Legal Opinion
WomanCare of Southfield, P.C. v. Granholm
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 26, 2001No. 2:00-cv-70585PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TARNOW, District Judge.
GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENTLY ENJOINING DEFENDANTS FROM ENFORCING MICHIGAN’S “INFANT PROTECTION ACT”, 1999 Mich.Pub.Acts 107, CODIFIED AT MICH.COMP. LAW § 750.90g
I.Introduction
These two cases are consolidated and are before the Court on the plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs are physicians practicing obstetrics and gynecology, and providers of women’s reproductive health services. The sole remaining defendant is Jennifer Granholm, in her official capacity as the Attorney General for the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carhart v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Richmond Medical Center for Women v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- National Abortion Federation v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- LeRoy Carhart v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Richmond Medical Center For Women v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.