Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. Taft
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 22, 2004No. C-1-04-493PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FIRST AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND DENYING DEFENDANT ALLEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (doc. # 2) and Defendant Michael K. Allen’s Motion To Dismiss This Action Under Federal Rule 12(B) (doc. # 28). Plaintiffs Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region, Planned Parenthood of Central Ohio, Planned Parenthood of Greater Cleveland, and Preterm (“Planned' Parenthood”) filed both the original Complaint (doc. # 1) and the Motion for Preliminary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Southeast Ohio Region v. DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Planned Parenthood Cincinnati Region v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. Mike DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. DewineDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- Planned Parenthood Southeast Ohio Region v. DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.