Legal Opinion
Barnes v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 12, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2006-0315PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is plaintiffs’ Motion [341] to Compel responses to interrogatories propounded in February 2012. Upon consideration of the Motion [341], the Opposition [347], the Reply [348], the entire record herein and the applicable law, plaintiffs’ Motion will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. For the reasons below, defendant has fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order to answer plaintiffs’ interrogatory by summarizing the expected testimony of the witnesses identified in defendant’s initial response. Plaintiffs’ Motion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Robert Geiserman v. John H. MacDonald A.B. & A.B. & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Equal Rights Center v. Post Properties, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Hilt v. SFC Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Sai v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Davis v. District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency,et AlDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Escamilla v. NuyenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.