Legal Opinion

Esparza v. Kadam, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1960No. Civ. 23725PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from ‘‘ that certain decree . . . and from the whole thereof, excepting only that part or portion or determination that the defendant . . . may purchase the share or interest of the plaintiff ... in the defendant . . . corporation. ’ ’

In this matter the plaintiff brought an action for involuntary dissolution of the defendant corporation and for money claimed to be due him for services rendered to the corporation, for a penalty for failure to pay the earnings when due, for attorney’s fees, court costs and other relief. Apparently (from the record which is before this court)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. County of Yuba v. North America Consolidated Gold Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Merlino v. Fresno MacAroni Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Boggs v. North American Bond & Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Carpenter v. Pacific Coast Ins. Assn.California Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rankin v. Frebank Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Go v. Pacific Health Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Rosner v. Benedict Heights, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. In Re O'Brien MacHinery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Weisman v. OdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API