County of Yuba v. North America Consolidated Gold Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
CROSS-APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of Yuba County, changing the place of trial of the action. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the opinion of the trial judge adopted by the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Defendants, North America Consolidated Gold Mining Company and Charles S. Deisem, moved for a change of the place of trial either to Sierra county or Santa Clara county. The court granted their motion to transfer the case, but designated the county of Sacramento as the place of trial. The trial judge, in making his order, rendered the following opinion in which the facts appear and in which we think the learned trial judge correctly states the law:
‘1 Some of the defendants in the above-entitled action have been sued under fictitious names and have not been served with summons, and under…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Los Angeles v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- South v. County of San BenitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- People v. Spring Valley Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.