Legal Opinion
Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 29, 1941No. 1471PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This suit is brought by the plaintiff to obtain an injunction to permanently enjoin the defendant from making, selling or distributing a product known as Kea in claimed competition with a product known as Nyafat, on the theory that under an implied negative covenant of a written contract between the plaintiff and the defendant, the defendant could not sell or distribute the product known as Kea because that product could be used for similar purposes as the product known as Nyafat.
The defendant is a responsible concern and was established some fifty years ago. It sells…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Callanan v. . K., A.C. L.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hudson Canal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Harper Bros. v. KlawDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Rosenwasser v. Blyn Shoes, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Fenning v. American Type FoundersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Dorsey v. Oregon Motor StagesOregon Supreme Court · 1947