Legal Opinion
Rosenwasser v. Blyn Shoes, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 22, 1927PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.
The complaint, as limited by the bill of particulars served, sets forth the following state of facts: The defendant Blyn Shoes, Inc., was a corporation, and the defendants Jacob Blyn and Henry Blyn were stockholders, officers and directors thereof. The defendants were engaged in the general business of selling shoes. The plaintiff was engaged in the business of manufacturing shoes. Rosenwasser Bros., Inc., a corporation controlled by the plaintiff Morris Rosenwasser, was also engaged in the manufacture of shoes. On April 23, 1924, the corporation Blyn Shoes, Inc., wrote the corporation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Callanan v. . K., A.C. L.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Day v. . PoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Gillet v. MaynardNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Chapman v. . the City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Waterson, Berlin & Snyder Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- D.C. Films, Inc. v. Best Film & Video Corp. (In Re Best Film & Video Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Nolan v. Sam Fox Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- 56-70 58th Street Holding Corp. v. Fedders-Quigan Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Direction Associates, Inc. v. Programming & Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.