Legal Opinion
The Ames & Carroll No. 20
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 17, 1933No. 343PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The injuries sustained by the scow were caused by collision with the abutment of the south draw of the Now York Central’s drawbridge which spans the Harlem river near its junction with the Hudson at Spuyten Duyvil. The scow was light, and was being towed stem first on a bridle hawser of about 30 feet in length by the tug Edwin Chilton, bound from 207th street on the Harlem river to the Dyekman street dock on the Hudson river, *414and thence to Kingston, N. Y. The accident occurred at about 1:30 a. m. on January 15, 1930. The night was dark, the weather slightly misty, and an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Williamson v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- The North StarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- The WolsumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- A & S Transportation Co., Inc. v. The Tug Fajardo, Etc. v. The United States of America, Third Party Pci International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Theothilatos v. Martin Marine Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Tug June S v. Bordagain Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Bleakley Transportation Co. v. Colonial Sand & Stone Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- The June AmesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.