Legal Opinion

The June Ames

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 17, 1933No. 421PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

These appeals present almost a complete reduplication of the collision described in onr opinion handed down herewith in Ames & Carroll v. The Tug Chilton, 66 F.(2d) 413. The tug had two tows on the same night, and brought each into collision with the abutment of the New York Central bridge. It was closed each time when the tow first appeared, and the tug rounded to against the tide to await its opening. When it did open, she maneuvered so unhandily as to make the tow collide with the center abutment, and in this case with both the center abutment and that on the south. Some of the damage was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. The Ames & Carroll No. 20Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. A & S Transportation Co., Inc. v. The Tug Fajardo, Etc. v. The United States of America, Third Party Pci International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. George L. Barger v. Bernard A. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. The EastlandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  4. Bishop v. St. Joseph-Chicago S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  5. F/V SAILOR, INC. v. City of RocklandDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API