Legal Opinion

United States v. Cally

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 17, 1966No. 65 Cr. 331PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANNELLA, District Judge.

Defendant Abraham Silinsky’s motion, pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e), for the suppression as evidence and return of a potpourri of personalty taken from his home by special agents of the Intelligence Division of the Internal Revenue Service at the time of his arrest on April 27,1965, is granted and the Government is hereby directed to return forthwith to the defendant all of the personalty seized, including any reproductions thereof, which it might still possess.1

On April 9, 1965, a six count indictment was returned charging Abraham Silinsky and four co-defendants,2…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. State v. FloranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. FloranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API