Legal Opinion
State v. Florance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 29, 1973PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
Defendant was charged with one count of menacing, ORS 163.190, and four counts of criminal activity, in drugs, ORS 167.207, for possession of marihuana, Numorphan, MDA (alpha-methyl-3-4me thylenedioxyphen ethyl amin e), and cocaine. A jury found him not guilty of menacing and possession of marihuana, and guilty of the other three counts of criminal activity in drugs. The trial judge entered a single conviction and imposed a single sentence.① Defendant appeals, contending the drugs introduced at trial were illegally seized. This contention raises important questions concerning searches and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. ElkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. HomerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.