Legal Opinion

Magana v. Wilbanks International

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 11, 1992No. 88-10463; CA A68727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Worker’s Compensation Board order denying an occupational disease claim. We remand for reconsideration.

Claimant suffers from end-stage renal disease (ESRD), a kidney condition. Claimant alleged that his disease results from a 1987 on-the-job exposure to chemical vapors. Respondent denied the claim, and the Board upheld the denial.

At the time of claimant’s disability, ORS 656.802(l)(a) defined an occupational disease as

“[a]ny disease or infection arising out of and in the course of employment * * * to which an employee is not ordinarily subjected or exposed other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. SAIF Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitlock v. Klamath County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Carling v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Johnston v. Gordon Trucking - Heartland ExpressCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API