State v. Bobby L. Tate
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
*202SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J.
¶ 52. (<dissenting). "Advances in technology offer great benefits to society in many areas. At the same time, they can pose significant risks to individual privacy rights."1 The proliferation of cell phones and their location tracking capabilities exemplify the risks to privacy rights posed by technological advancement.
¶ 53. The criminal cases State v. Tate2 and State v. Subdiaz-Osorio3 raise the question whether individuals have a constitutional right of privacy in their cell phone location data. In other words, do the United States4 and Wisconsin Constitutions5…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.