Legal Opinion

Long v. . Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff's counsel moved for judgment, stating that there was an affidavit filed or he would file a sufficient affidavit. His Honor declined to give judgment, but gave plaintiff time to file affidavits to obtain the jurisdiction of the court, and gave to defendant time to answer.

On 4 December the plaintiff filed an affidavit, as follows:

"S. L. Long, being duly sworn, says that the defendant company has its general place of business in the city of New Orleans, and therefore prays a summons and asks that process issue that the same may be sent to the sheriff or other proper officer of that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Toland v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. York v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Wilson v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. . CecilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Bowersock v. BowersockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Voehringer v. . PollockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Bridger v. . MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Adams v. . PackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API