Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Seligman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1892No. 177PublishedCited by 76 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. This was an action brought by Wilson, a citizen of Missouri, against' Seligman, a citizen of New York, in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, and duly removed by the defendant •into the Circuit Court of the United States.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. This was an action brought by Wilson, a citizen of Missouri, against' Seligman, a citizen of New York, in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, and duly removed by the defendant •into the Circuit Court of the United States. The action was upon an order or judgment of the state court under section 736 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri of 1879, (which is copied in the margin,1) by which execution was awarded against the ' defendant as a stockholder in the Memphis, Carthage and Northwestern Railroad…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Gray,

after stating the case as above, delivered, the opinion of the court.

The statute of Missouri, under which these proceedings were hadj authorizes execution upon a judgment against a corporation to be ordered against any of its stockholders, only to the extent of the unpaid balance of their stock, and “ upon motion in open court, after sufficient notice in writing to the persons sought to be charged.” Missouri Gen. Stat. 1865, c. 62, § 11; Rev. Stat. 1879, § 736; Rev. Stat. 1889, § 2517. Each person sought to' be charged as a stockholder is thus given the right, before…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. D'Arcy v. KetchumSupreme Court of the United States · 1851

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. MenefeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API