Legal Opinion

Harden v. Stangle

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided November 12, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00981Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION TIFFANY HARDEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 3:18-cv-00981 RUSSELL STANGLE and SEWARD ) Judge Aleta A. Trauger MOTOR FREIGHT INC., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM Before the court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Russell Stangle and Seward Motor Freight, Inc. (“Seward”) (collectively, “defendants”). (Doc. No. 32.) As discussed below, the defendants have established that there are no material factual disputes and that they are entitled to judgment in their favor as a matter of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pittman v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. Carolyn T. Rodgers v. Elizabeth BanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. Heidi Hostettler v. College of WoosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  5. Brittany Harris v. Kimberly KlareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API