Legal Opinion
Ryan v. Asbestos Workers Union Local 42 Pension Fun
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 24, 2002No. 00-2813, 00-2891UnknownCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Asbestos Workers Union Local 42 Pension Fund, Asbestos Workers Union Local 42 Pension Plan (Plan), and the trustees of the Plan (Trustees) appeal the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff John V. Ryan, Jr. Defendants challenge the District Court’s conclusion that they violated 204(g) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., by impermissibly reducing Ryan’s accrued benefits. On cross-appeal, Ryan challenges the District Court’s refusal to award attorney’s fees pursuant to ERISA §…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Anthuis v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Reform Party of Allegheny County v. Allegheny County Department of Elections Mark Wolosik, Director of the Allegheny County Department of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Paul F. McPherson v. Employees' Pension Plan of American Re-Insurance Company, Inc. Pension Committee of Employees' Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Abnathya v. Hoffmann-La RocheCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. v. Bellezza Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Mull v. Motion Picture Industry Health PlanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Cabanillas v. 4716 IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- SANDOZ INC. v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024