Legal Opinion

SANDOZ INC. v. UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 6, 2024No. 2:19-cv-10170Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SANDOZ INC. and RAREGEN, LLC, Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:19-cv-10170 (BRM) (JSA) v. OPINION UNITED THERAPUTICS CORP., Defendant. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before this Court is Defendant United Therapeutics Corporation’s (“UTC”) Motion for Stay of Execution of Judgment Pending Appeal Without Bond. (ECF No. 509.) Plaintiff Sandoz Inc. (“Sandoz”) filed an Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 515), and UTC filed a Reply (ECF No. 517). Having reviewed the submissions filed in connection with the Motion and having declined to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daniel R. Arban, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. West Publishing Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Joseph Dillon v. City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Tunis Bros. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. In Re Diet DrugsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API