Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Stamey
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 20, 1931No. 7757PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. The estoppel sought to be set up in this ease against the claimant, on account of his having assented to the contract by his infant son and attested the mortgage on the crop, is one which, if sufficient in law and fact, may be set up at law. Georgia Pacific Railway Co. v. Strickland, 80 Ga. 776 (6 S. E. 27, 12 Am. St. R. 282); Equitable *283Loan & Security Co. v. Lewman, 124 Ga. 190 (52 S. E. 599, 3 L. R. A. (N. S.) 879); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Koehler, 161 Ga. 934 (132 S. E. 64).
No. 7757. February 20, 1931.
2. The ease is not one in equity, nor does it involve any issue or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor Lumber Co. v. Clark Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. LewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Georgia Pacific Railway Co. v. StricklandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Gilmore v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rogers v. Miller Peanut CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- BONNY CORPORATION v. McCarthySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Rogers v. Miller Peanut Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1945