Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Miller Peanut Company

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1945No. 15295PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Where a defendant, in answer to an equitable petition for injunctive relief, sets up a money demand, and asks a judgment therefore against the petitioner, and, after the grant of a temporary restraining order, the petitioner voluntarily dismisses his action, such a dismissal removes all equitable questions involved in the case, and the Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction of the writ of error.(a) The response, denominated a "plea of equitable estoppel," merely set forth reasons why the petitioner was estopped from urging a dismissal of the cross-action along with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hood v. DurenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Porter v. Davey Tree-Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Holloway v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. Holloway v. DorseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Puckett v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. BONNY CORPORATION v. McCarthySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Capitol Fish Co. v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Rogers v. Miller Peanut CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  4. Rumph v. RisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  5. Toler v. GoodinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API