Rogers v. Miller Peanut Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for the defendant in error filed a motion in the Supreme Court, stating that all equitable relief sought in the original petition had been eliminated, and asking that the case be transferred to the Court of Appeals.
“Where an equitable petition for injunctive relief is filed, and the defendant enters general and special demurrers thereto, and *839a plea and answer setting np a claim for a money demand and asking a judgment therefor against the plaintiff, and after the demurrers are overruled and an interlocutory injunction is granted,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hood v. DurenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Porter v. Davey Tree-Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Holloway v. DorseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Puckett v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Pearson v. StameySupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- BONNY CORPORATION v. McCarthySupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
- Capitol Fish Co. v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Rogers v. Miller Peanut CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Rumph v. RisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
- Tucker v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.