Legal Opinion
Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C. v. Borodkin
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 20, 2013No. CV-11-01426-PHX-GMSPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are several Motions. Defendants pro se Raymond Mobrez and Iliana Llaneras (“the AEI Plaintiffs”) have filed two “Anti-SLAPP” Motions to Stay or Strike the First Amended Complaint. (Docs. 162, 195.) The Court denies those Motions. The AEI Plaintiffs have also filed a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 153) and a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 156). Those Motions are granted in part and denied in part. The Motions for Sanctions brought by the AEI Plaintiffs (Docs. 150, 158, 205) are therefore denied. Defendant Lisa Jean Borodkin has…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nichols v. HarrisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
- AmSurg Holdings Incorporated v. AnireddyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Beauchamp v. MuiseDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Hall v. Baltimore Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- In Re Non-Party Deposition SubpoenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.