Legal Opinion
In Re Non-Party Deposition Subpoena
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 9, 2026No. Misc. No. 2026-0018Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LENNY R. JIANG, et al., Petitioners, v. Case No. 26-mc-18-ABJ-MJS NVIDIA CORP., et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This proceeding is an offshoot from a patent-infringement matter pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. NVIDIA Corp. and NVIDIA Singapore Pte. Ltd. (together, “NVIDIA”)—defendants in the underlying case—served Rule 45 document and deposition subpoenas on Petitioners Paratus Law Group and its managing member, attorney Lenny Jiang, based on their prior role as prosecution counsel…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Eli Lilly and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.