Kane v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action for declaratory judgment, alleging that defendant’s Ordinance No. 92 is unconstitutional in that it imposes an income tax on self-employed persons 1 and on no other class of individuals or businesses. He appeals from a judgment for defendant entered after the latter’s motion for summary judgment was granted as to all five claims for relief. We affirm.
Defendant is a municipal corporation authorized generally to levy an income tax on the earnings of all persons and businesses residing in the district and on income of nonresidents derived from sources within the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Jarvill v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roberts v. Gray's Crane & Rigging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Knapp I v. City of JacksonvilleOregon Tax Court · 2004
- City of Eugene v. Comcast of Oregon II, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014