Legal Opinion

State v. Larson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1922No. 16976PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Askren, J., entered June 14, 1921, upon a trial and conviction of a violation of the hanking laws.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— Appellant was indicted, tried, convicted and sentenced for an alleged violation of the *124banking laws, being based on § 52, oh. 80, Laws of 1917, p. 297. That section is as follows:

“No bank or trust company shall, nor shall any officer or employee thereof on behalf of such corporation, directly or indirectly, loan any sum of money to any director, officer or employee of such corporation, unless a resolution authorizing the same and approved by a majority of the directors, at a meeting at which no director, officer or employee to whom the loan is to be made shall be present, shall be entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. United States v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. State v. BokienWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. StewartWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RinkesWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State v. GossWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. PellaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API