J.H., Jr., & E.T., Sr. Wurz Realty Partnership v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioners commenced this proceeding to challenge the determination of respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of New York Mills (Board) interpreting the Zoning Law of New York Mills as imposing a 200-foot minimum rear yard setback requirement on their property and denying their application for an area variance for the construction of an addition to the main building.
Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition insofar as it sought a declaration that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MATTER OF SASSO v. OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Frishman v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Khan v. Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Doyle v. AmsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Frampton v. Zoning Board of Appeals for the Town of LloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- W.K.J. Young Group v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Homeyer v. Town of Skaneateles Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Hampton Hill Villas Condominium Board of Managers v. Town of Amherst Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004