Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Pettis

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 1, 1930No. Patent Appeal 2505, 2506PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an interference ease and comes before us on cross-appeals of the parties.

The interference involves certain patents granted to Thompson and an application filed by Pettis, the latter copying into his application sixteen of the various claims which had been patented to Thompson. The interference, as declared, involved sixteen counts. Four of those were eliminated upon a motion to dissolve the interference, and it was reformed, the remaining counts becoming respectively counts numbered 1 to 12, inclusive, which are now before the court. All of the counts relate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beidler v. CapsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  2. Pengilly v. CopelandCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Sweetland v. ColeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. Doherty v. DubbsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  5. Atherton v. PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API