Legal Opinion

William Iselin & Co. v. Saunders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1950No. 311PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

The transactions giving rise to this litigation are susceptible of several constructions which would have afforded the defendants either complete or partial exoneration from liability to the Falcon Sportswear Company if it had sued the defendants directly upon the claim now in suit.

The Falcon Sportswear Company could not have recovered of the defendants for goods sold and delivered without establishing a contract, either express or implied, between it and the defendants, obligating the defendants to accept and pay for the goods.

All direct negotiations on tbe part of tbe defendants were bad…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Cincinnati Siemens-Lungren Gas Illuminating Co. v. Western Siemens-Lungren Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. First National Bank of New Windsor v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Dodds v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Graham v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Sprouse v. North River InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Leasing Service Corp. v. CraneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. STANDARD AMUSEMENT COMPANY v. TarkingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. HaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API