Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Kahrs

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1945No. 15168PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first ground of demurrer is that the allegations of the petition do not set forth a cause of action against the defendant. The petition shows that prior to the alleged termination of the contract, the defendant was not given the 30 days’ notice as provided therein; but counsel for the petitioners insist that the clause as to notice was substantially complied with by sending him a notice and a check for a month’s salary in advance, and that the agreement was “thereby terminated” as of that day. This reasoning would probably be sound if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. HaasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Felton Beauty Supply Company Inc. v. LevySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Felton Beauty Supply Co. v. LevySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Webb v. Pullman Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Olin Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Central Industries, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Young Travelers Day Camps, Inc. v. FelsenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  3. Woodall v. PharrCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. Yon v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Hubert v. Luden's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API