Legal Opinion
Prentice v. Apfel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 1, 1998No. 96 Civ. 9618(PKL)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Sheila Prentice brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Plaintiff seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying her applications for social security disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). Now before this Court are plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and defendant’s cross-motion for the same. For the reasons discussed below, each motion is granted in part…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ermano Valente v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Eugenio CRUZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Minnie Gold v. The Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Merck & Co. v. Mediplan Health Consulting, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Labajo v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- VCG Special Opportunities Master Fund Ltd. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Garber v. Legg Mason, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Jones v. ApfelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.