Legal Opinion
Jones v. Apfel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 20, 1999No. 98 CIV. 3389(WHP)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Ruth Jones (“Jones”) brings this action against the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of a final decision denying her disability benefits. This matter was referred to a magistrate judge. Both parties moved for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The magistrate judge recommended that the plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted to the extent of remanding the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- McDonaugh v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Batista v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Devora v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Rosa v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Pabon v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.