Legal Opinion

Dover, Somersworth & Rochester Street Railway Co. v. Wentworth

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 4, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

The plaintiff’s claim depends upon the validity of its principal contention that in the carriage of the employees of the Plant corporation the defendant Wentworth is engaged in the business of a common carrier within the terms of P. L., c. 258, s. 1. Authorities from jurisdictions construing statutes dissimilar in form or purpose can be of little aid. The meaning of our statute as applied to the facts here is not an open question.

As originally enacted the section provided: “Every person, firm or corporation operating any motor vehicle other than a street car upon any public street or way in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haselton v. Interstate Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Faucher v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1895
  3. State v. DownesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Knoxville Transit LinesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  2. Appeal of ZimmermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. Appeal of ZimmermanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. Sheldon v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API