Legal Opinion
Appeal of Zimmerman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 31, 1997No. 95-420PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
Paul E. Zimmerman appeals an order of the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUG or commission) declaring that because Zimmerman offers his tenants telecommunications services, he is operating a public utility within the meaning of RSA 362:2 (1995) and is, therefore, within the commission’s jurisdiction. We reverse.
*606I
Zimmerman owns and manages several commercial buildings in Wolfeboro. These buildings are clustered near one another. Approximately fifty-six commercial and retail tenants occupy space in four of these buildings. In addition, Zimmerman leases space to “transient tenants”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Appeal of Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Appeal of Omni Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
- Allied New Hampshire Gas Co. v. Tri-State Gas & Supply Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
- Dover, Somersworth & Rochester Street Railway Co. v. WentworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bridle Bit Ranch Co. v. Basin Electric Power CooperativeWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Nashua Teachers Union v. Nashua School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998