Legal Opinion

Tennessee Cent. Ry. Co. v. Dunn

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 27, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.

This is an action by the administrator against the Railway Company to recover $20,000 damages for the negligent killing of the plaintiff’s intestate, Nora Mai Dunn, caused by a collision, at a street crossing over the railroad track, in the town of Lebanon, between one of the defendant’s trains and an automobile in which Mrs. Dunn was riding.

The declaration contained five counts, but the third count was stricken on demurrer. The first count was based on averments of common-law negligence as follows: That the defendant Railway Company was operating its train at a dangerous rate of speed,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chattanooga Rapid Transit Co. v. WaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. BrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Artenberry v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RossCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  5. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. BrymerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wolfswinkel v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Southern Pacific Company v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Casteel v. Southern Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Wolfswinkel v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API