Speedway Promoters, Inc. v. Hooter's of America, Inc.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THORNBURG, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, opposed by the Plaintiff. For the reasons stated herein, the Defendants’ motion is denied in part, granted in part, and the ruling on Plaintiffs claim for punitive damages is deferred until trial.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Summary judgment is appropriate if there is no genuine issue of material fact and judgment for the moving party is warranted as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). A genuine issue exists if a reasonable jury considering the evidence could return a verdict…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rogers v. Unitrim Auto and Home Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Static Control Components, Inc. v. Darkprint Imaging, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2001
- NORTH CAROLINA MUT. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. McKINLEY FINANCIAL SERVICEDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2005