Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Schoenfeld

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1923No. 3842PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

This is an action to determine conflicting- claims to the nse of the waters of two springs in Kane county, this state.

The state of Utah was made a party defendant. Neither pleading nor appearance, however, was made by the state and the trial court determined the issues between the plaintiffs and the defendant Schoenfeld without regard to the state’s interest in the controversy, if it had any interest, and we shall so determine this appeal. In the course of the opinion whenever the word “defendant” is used reference is had only to the defendant Schoenfeld.

It is alleged in the complaint that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Speer v. StephensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Merritt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Steptoe Live Stock Co. v. GulleyNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Tanner v. Provo Reservoir Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Duchesne County v. HumpherysUtah Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API