Merritt v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of InyoCounty and from an order refusing a new trial. Wm. D. Dehy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiff sued for the purpose of obtaining an adjudication of the alleged conflicting claims of the plaintiff and defendant, respectively, to the use of the water of Haiwee Creek in Inyo County, and to enjoin the defendant from claiming or using the same and from interfering with plaintiff’s use. The defendant in its answer alleged that it is the owner of the first and paramount right to take from said creek all the water flowing therein to the extent of three hundred inches constant flow, under a four-inch pressure. Upon the trial the evidence showed that the normal flow of the creek…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Senior v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Inyo Consol. Water Co. v. JessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
- Yuba River Power Co. v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Palmer Etc. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Madera Irrigation District v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Tehachapi-Cummings County Water District v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.