Legal Opinion
Jiminez v. Going Forward, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 19, 1998No. 3:98-cv-01899PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO REMAND
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This action was removed to this Court by Defendant Going Forward, Inc. (“GF”), pursuant to a Notice of Removal dated September 28, 1998. The claimed basis for federal jurisdiction is 28 U.S.C. § 1441, inasmuch as one of Plaintiffs claims arises under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. (“Magnuson-Moss”), which could confer federal question jurisdiction on this Court. Plaintiff has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447, to remand this case to the Superior Court, asserting that there exists no federal…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- H. Keith Zahn v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Sir Speedy, Inc. v. L & P Graphics, Inc., Neil H. Blatte and Business Service Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Tillquist v. Ford Motor Credit Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Rose v. a & L MOTOR SALESDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bristol Technology, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Cotterell v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Favata v. JD MotorsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
- Johns-Pratt v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020