Legal Opinion
Tillquist v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 15, 1989No. Civ. A. N-85-533 (RCZ)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ZAMPANO, Senior District Judge.
In this action plaintiff, Ralph Tillquist, seeks to recover damages against Ford Mo tor Credit Company (FMCC) as a result of the alleged wrongful repossession of plaintiff’s automobile, and unfair collection practices.
A two-day bench trial was held at which several witnesses testified on behalf of both parties. On the basis of all the evidence presented at trial the Court concludes: (1) that plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that defendant engaged in any wrongful activity in connection with the repossession of plaintiff’s automobile; (2)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Collens v. New Canaan Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CenanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Sportsmen's Boating Corp. v. HensleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sawtelle v. Waddell & Reed, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Petrolito v. Arrow Financial Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Moe v. John Deere Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp. v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Travis v. Boulevard Bank N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.