Cooney v. Pennsylvania Osteopathic Ass'n
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
In this action the plaintiff sought and gained a decree in the court below declaring him to be a valid honorary member of the Pennsylvania Osteopathic Association. For the reasons which follow, the decree must be vacated.
The action was instituted by the filing of a petition for a rule to show cause. This procedure was improper. A complaint in equity was the correct course to pursue: Garrett v. McHenry, 403 Pa. 451, 170 A. 2d 363 (1961), and 2 Pennsylvania Standard Practice, 473 et seq. Cf. also, Hemphill v. Lenz, 413 Pa. 9, 195 A. 2d 780 (1963).
But since the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hemphill v. LenzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Sessa v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Garrett v. McHenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pennsylvania Crime Commission PetitionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Reading Anthracite Co. v. RichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- KRUPA BY KRUPA v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Holt's Cigar Co. v. 222 Liberty AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Partrick & Wilkins Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.