Legal Opinion

Cooney v. Pennsylvania Osteopathic Ass'n

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1969No. Appeal, No. 84PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

In this action the plaintiff sought and gained a decree in the court below declaring him to be a valid honorary member of the Pennsylvania Osteopathic Association. For the reasons which follow, the decree must be vacated.

The action was instituted by the filing of a petition for a rule to show cause. This procedure was improper. A complaint in equity was the correct course to pursue: Garrett v. McHenry, 403 Pa. 451, 170 A. 2d 363 (1961), and 2 Pennsylvania Standard Practice, 473 et seq. Cf. also, Hemphill v. Lenz, 413 Pa. 9, 195 A. 2d 780 (1963).

But since the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hemphill v. LenzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Sessa v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Garrett v. McHenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Crime Commission PetitionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Reading Anthracite Co. v. RichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. KRUPA BY KRUPA v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Holt's Cigar Co. v. 222 Liberty AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Partrick & Wilkins Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API